Can I be on the enemies list too?

School of bones (red)
Big congrats to PeeZed for his continued annoyance of the Discovery Institute, and equally big props to the admin/PR folks here at UMM for making sure that people list Paul as being from the University of Minnesota, Morris, and not our little sister campuses in the Twin Cities. It would be easy for UMM to turn a blind eye to this whole thing, quietly distancing themselves from Paul’s work, and I’m damned impressed that they’ve made such a clearheaded effort to support him (or at least remain clearly connected to him) in this way.

What’s equally impressive is the excellent way that Paul responded, taking the opportunity to point out UMM’s continuing support for the wide diversity of beliefs and backgrounds (religious and otherwise) at UMM.

We have an excellent university out here in our lonely stretch of the prairie, and I think it is wonderful that the Discovery Institute has chosen to mock us for our institutional support for diversity. That’s public relations gold. “Come to UMM—the university the Intelligent Design creationists detest!” It’s good timing, too, as this is when we’re trying to get students to apply and enroll for the next academic year. It’s not too late: if you know any high school seniors, send them to our page for prospective students, have them apply, and we promise to give them a first-rate liberal arts education if they are accepted and choose to come here. As another bonus, the Discovery Institute’s PR is going to discourage students who are poor at science, the only ones who approve of their message, from coming here. It’s free advertising, and it’s going to select for a better applicant pool. Woo-hoo!

Globe and desk
“Woo-hoo!” indeed! I know that our lives are absolutely enriched by friendships with people with a broad range beliefs and experiences, from Christian to Athiest and from Buddhist to Wicca. I’ve also been lucky enough to have done research (mostly in evolutionary computation) with well over a dozen of our fine students here at UMM since arriving in 1991, and they’ve ranged from athiests of a flavor not unlike Paul to a great collaborator who went on to spend two years in seminary in Scotland.

Oh, and WeatherGirl (who brought PeeZed’s post to my attention) says “Woo-hoo!” as well :-). She’s painting closets at the moment, though, so the response was left to me. We’re hoping she comes out of the closet soon, though, and you might hear more from her then.

No tag for this post.

Related posts

Timeshifting is not piracy!

Porcine dreams
Props to Alex (whose blog looks pretty but has no posts) for pointing me at this Ars Techica article on more damn silliness going on in D.C. Once again the Media Mogul Puppet Masters (seen here napping) are trying to get our Congress Creatures (or is it them napping?) to dance to their tune, and once again we have to try to stop them. I quite agree with this new piece and this earlier Ars piece that the real issue is about Fair Use and Consumer Rights and not this damn fool piracy argument. There’s no question that (some) large scale piracy exists, is illegal, and should be stopped.

But that’s not what these proposals address. They make it so that I can’t pause the Tivo in mid-program to take a phone call or go make some nachos (why aren’t the snack food companies on our side on this one?!?). They make it so I have to watch all the damn commercials, and at the time when they’re initially aired. They make it so I can’t re-watch a program (and its commercials) over and over until my brain melts, unless, of course, I’m willing to pay for every re-viewing.

Take all that and replace “viewing TV” with “reading a book or magazine” and it becomes painfully obvious what a dramatic change this would make to the (very old) status quo. And it’s a change that hurts consumers and small media producers and lines the pockets and increases the control of Big Media. This is not a Good Thing.

It majorly ticks me off when these So-Called Capitalists put all this effort into protecting themselves from the horrors of trade that’s actually free. Yes, we fast forward over many commercials. But not all commercials. There are even ads that we go out of our way to watch. We watched the recent iPod/iTunes commercial featuring Eminem about a zillion times and then went and bought the song from iTunes. Shock! Horror! Advertising that worked! WeatherGirl and Sub-Evil Boy watch darn near every movie ad that airs. We probably pay more attention to the ads at the Super Bowl than we do to the game. Some advertising can be interesting and effective. Some advertising is boring or annoying. Giving the consumer the ability to choose where to invest their neurons and their dollars is part of the game, and that should hold for TV (as a proxy for digital) just as much as it holds for print (as a proxy for analog).

But in the silver lining department, what wonderful timing for the honors course Arne and I are teaching next semester on exactly this topic :-). (Actually it’s about open source and network economics, but it all comes down to the same intellectual property issues.) Nothing like having a hot, active topic to motivate the discussion! Maybe we’ll have them read up on this over the holidays

No tag for this post.

Related posts