Next thing you know, people might start walking

'Critical Mass Ride' by Famewhore
It’s long been the case in the U.S. that companies could get tax breaks on money they spent assisting employees in driving cars to/from work (including the vehicle itself, fuel, parking, etc.). Some crazy hippies or eco-terrorists or some such have proposed the radical idea that similar tax breaks should also exist in support of people cycling to work. H.R. 1498 would (according to the League of American Cyclists):

provide bicyclists with a similar tax benefit to that currently enjoyed by transit users and car parkers, through voluntary, employer-run programs. This small incentive to ride rather than drive to and from work should be seen as an important element of broader efforts to tackle climate change as well as traffic congestion, obesity and other critical challenges.

That clearly sounds like a terrible idea – it’s obviously my Great American Right to be fat, lazy, and drive a big-ass SUV whenever humanly possible, and lord knows the tax code should encourage such behavior whenever and however possible.

Wacko loonies who would actually wish to support such nonsense, however, can read the text of the bill or even contact your congress critters and publicly express your silly ideas.

I did, and it was fun!

No tag for this post.

Related posts

OK, Ron Paul not so much my friend

Spilling over
Ron Paul was pretty cool on the Daily Show as career Republicans go. If nothing else he seems straightforward and believable. The devil’s in the details, however, and Paul’s the sole sponsor of a new bill that smells all wrong to me. H.R. 2415, the Affordable Gas Price Act (full text from Thomas) aims to reduce gas prices at pretty much any cost. That’s a problem for me, as I think we burn way too much fuel here in the U.S., and making it cheaper just ain’t gonna help.

Goals such as these just seem like a really bad idea to me:

Sec. 3. Termination of restrictions on oil and natural gas development on Federal lands.

Sec. 4. Limitation of suits under National Environmental Policy Act of 1969.

Sec. 6. Suspension of fuel taxes on highway motor fuels when weekly United States retail gasoline prices exceed benchmark.

This sort of silliness only makes any sense in a world where you refuse to acknowledge any of the evidence on climate change. Pretty much as bad as raising your hand at a debate as a creationist in my book. I wasn’t particularly expecting to vote for a Republican in ’08, and that’s one more I can cross off my list.

No tag for this post.

Related posts