One could despair of any sensible tech policy

It doesn't add up anymore
I think that one of the great tragedies of American political life is the almost complete lack of scientific/technical literacy on the part of our elected policy makers. With a re-election rate in the House of 98% (and I’ve heard that the turnover in the Senate slower than the UK House of Lords, where you only leave in a pine box!), it’s perhaps not terribly surprising that both bodies are dominated by people (OK, let’s be honest: Old White Men) for whom e-mail is still a recent novelty and blogging is a mystery, and whose vision of a national scientific initiative dates back to the space program and the cold war.

As a truly depressing example of how incredibly out of touch our legislators can be is found in this piece, which includes a transcript of some truly incoherent comments from that genius Senator Ted Stevens (R-Alaska). I particularly love this gem:

I just the other day got, an internet was sent by my staff at 10 o’clock in the morning on Friday and I just got it yesterday. Why?

Luckily, I don’t think that anyone’s ever tried to send me an entire Internet, since I don’t think the U’s mail servers would cope very well. Unfortunately no small excerpt really captures how entirely out of whack Stevens is, so I recommend at least skimming the full transcript.

Now I certainly wouldn’t argue that we should fill the halls of our legislature with 20-something pastey white boys, but if those houses are to be representative of our populace, we certainly need to do better than we are now. Any suggestions on questions we should be asking our candidates this fall?

Tip of the cap to Ellery for the pointer.

No tag for this post.

Related posts

I quite enjoyed my Cafe Scientifique talk

Enigma rotors by Foo

Photo by Bob Lord via Wikipedia

Of course I never actually mentioned here (at least not recently) that I was giving a Cafe Scientifique talk, but I did and it went fine. I gave a presentation last night at the Common Cup coffee house entitled “An overview of cryptography: What happens to your credit card number on-line, and is that e-mail really from your boss?”. The audience was small (20-ish?), but attentive and interested, and I think it went nicely. The truly shiftless can download a PDF copy of my slides for their amusement.

Many thanks to PeeZeed for bringing this wonderful Cafe Scientifique idea to Morris and organizing the events. The quality of both the talks and the audiences has been very high, and I know I’ve learned a lot from attending.

The one slightly unfortunate thing has been the degree to which the audiences have been primarily University folk, and science folk at that. Nothing wrong with that (I got lots of very cool questions last night, for example), but if one of the goals of C.S. is to bring science to the “general public”, having the audience be largely university science faculty isn’t quite the game plan.

Cafe Scientifique logo
I think that there are some historical and cultural issues at work. Also, despite the oft-heard mantra that “There’s nothing to do in Morris”, there were quite a few competing events last night that I know pulled quite a few people away. Ultimately, though, we haven’t done a terribly great job of advertising/promoting these things. Sadly, I’m as guilty as anyone here. I had grand plans to promote last night’s talk (radio interviews, newspaper promotion, posters, etc., etc.), but in the end life pushed this right on down the list of important things to do. Sigh.

We’ve got one more this school year, with Mark Logan discussing origami and mathematics, which should be a fun evening. We’re great at the science – now we just need to work on our PR. :-)

No tag for this post.

Related posts