Death by PowerPoint…literally…

OK, I promise to stop with the PowerPoint bashing Real Soon Now, but the situation is just so terrible that it’s hard to walk away.

In reading this thread from Tufte’s Q&A thing (sort of like his blog), he points to this post from the Arms and Influence blog, which quotes Thomas Ricks’ book Fiasco. Apparently the geniuses in the Bush Misadministration have taken to replacing direct orders and clear plans with PowerPoint Phluff, leaving the well meaning folks at the Pentagon struggling to make sense of it all. Check out, for example, this truly wondrous bit of Phluff that purports to explain how something as complex as the occupation phase of the current Iraq war was going to work:
PowerPoint Phluff explaining how the occupation phase of the current Iraq war was going to work.
Ah, right. I know exactly what to do now…

It’s worth repeating the conclusion from the Arms and Influence piece:

The Iraq disaster did not happen because someone in the JTF-IV planning group or the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) couldn’t write a good PowerPoint presentation. The problem was that anyone used PowerPoint to plan a war. Ricks is absolutely right in saying that only the most careless individual, in love with information technology for its own sake, would misuse technology in such an obvious fashion. Unfortunately, these are the people who planned and executed the Iraq war, and many of them are still prosecuting America’s wars.

BTW, Ricks give an excellent interview on The Daily Show recently. I suspect that Fiasco would be a very worthwhile (if quite depressing) read. After a little skimming I also was surprisingly impressed by the Arms and Influence blog (the title didn’t seem like my cup of tea). His description of flying on the day when the “liquids plot” broke in Britain is thoughtful and retains an impressive sense of perspective under difficult circumstances.

Related posts

A wonderfully damning indictment of PowerPoint

In prepration for coordinating our CSci senior seminar course here at UMM, I’m reading the second edition of Edward R. Tufte’s excellent pamphlet The cognitive style of PowerPoint: Pitching out currupts within. I’d used the first edition a few years ago and really liked it, and the second is just has brilliant.

Tufte’s work is massively quotable, so it’s hard to choose, but I think this bit pretty much sums up the deal:

Both the Columbia Accident Investigation Board and the Return to Flight Task Group were filled with smart experienced people with spectacular credentials. These review boards examined what is probably the best evidence available on PP [PowerPoint] for technical work: hundreds of PP decks from a high-IQ government agency thoroughly practiced in PP. Both review boards concluded that (1) PowerPoint is an inappropriate tool for engineering reports, presentations, documentation and (2) the technical report is superior to PP. Matched up against alternative tools, PowerPoint lost.

The short version is that PowerPoint frankly sucks as a medium for conveying complex and information rich material. For example,

Compared with the worldwide publications shown here, the PP [PowerPoint] statistical graphics are the thinnest of all, except for those in Pravda in 1982, back when that newspaper operated as the major propaganda instrument of the Soviet communist party and a totalitarian government. Doing a bit better than Pravda is not good enough…

It’s a brilliant pamphlet and only costs $7, so there’s really no excuse for rushing out and getting one if you haven’t done so yet.

I’m particularly struck by this because a few days ago we had two classic mis-uses of PowerPoint at our opening faculty/staff convocation of the school year. One used a retina destroying color scheme motivated (I think) by a desire to work with our school colors, which almost certainly weren’t chosen for their typographic suitability, and another presenter suffered from the all too familiar problem of constantly jumping to the wrong slide and struggling to navigate to the desired location. These were bright, skilled people who regularly (and rightly) represent our institution out in the world, and their choice and use of PowerPoint made them look, well, silly.

Sigh.

Much like Peter Norvig’s excellent re-casting of the Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address as a PowerPoint presentation:

Good morning. Just a second while I get this connection to work. Do I press this button here? Function-F7? No, that’s not right. Hmmm. Maybe I’ll have to reboot. Hold on a minute. Um, my name is Abe Lincoln and I’m your president. While we’re waiting, I want to thank Judge David Wills, chairman of the committee supervising the dedication of the Gettysburg cemetery. It’s great to be here, Dave, and you and the committee are doing a great job. Gee, sometimes this new technology does have glitches, but we couldn’t live without it, could we? Oh – is it ready? OK, here we go

If you’ve never read it, drop everything and go there now!

Braided river

Related posts